|
Date: Sunday 13th March 2022, 2.00pm
Live on Sky Sports
Venue: Stamford Bridge
Conditions: Challenging
Programme: £3.50 cover price - although sanctions applied to CFC
saw the club shop shut and street sellers absent, meaning that
programmes couldn't actually be bought.
Online sales via their provider ReachSport also stopped.
Corporates in attendance received free copies.
|
|
Chelsea |
|
Newcastle |
|
1 - 0 |
|
|
|
|
Teams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
mins) Kai Havertz and Dan Burn were involved in an aerial duel for a
dropping ball near to the halfway line, the former ending up with a yellow
card and the latter needing treatment for an elbow to the face.
Half time: Chelsea 0 Newcastle 0
(57
mins) Despite the attentions of Trevoh Chalobah, Jacob Murphy made progress
into the left hand side of the Chelsea box, prompting Chalobah to attempt a
trip, clearly grab the right shoulder of the Newcastle player's shirt and
then try another trip.
Referee Coote incorrectly awarded a corner and VAR official Brooks reviewed the footage
before agreeing that no foul had been committed. He also decreed that there
was no case for sending Coote to the pitchside monitor, despite it becoming
obvious that the referee had an obstructed view of the incident.
89 mins There seemed to be little danger when Antonio Rudiger and
Jorginho exchanged a series of passes in the Newcastle half just beyond the
centre circle. With all 11 visiting players ahead of him, the latter stepped
infield to pick out Kai Havertz as he sped into the United box from the
right.
Passing Dan Burn and leaving the defender stumbling as he tried to pursue
him, the German striker scored his fourth goal in three games thanks to a
cushioning touch with his left foot and a flick of the same boot to take the
ball beyond the stranded Dubravka, netting from six yards out. 0-1
Full time:
Chelsea 1 Newcastle 0
Eddie Howe said:
"Really
disappointed to lose our unbeaten run in that way, so late in the
game - a moment of quality from them, a great goal from their
perspective.
"We've defended so well today: we've really minimised their chances.
We've defended in a really diligent way - tactically excellent - and
yeah, sucker punch at the end.
"I can't look past the penalty. I'm hugely disappointed with that
decision and how they've reached that decision. Jacob's had his shirt
ripped off his back. Clear penalty.
"If the referee doesn't give it on
the pitch I can understand that but the VAR has to at least make the
referee go and review his own decision because if he does he'll realise
he got it wrong.
"It could have been a red. I'm not going to sit here and say it should
have been a red. Dan (Burn) thinks it's a red. He's on the pitch. It could have
been given - but the one I can't understand is the penalty.
"We lost Joe Willock and Jonjo Shelvey (on Saturday, through
illness). This wasn't (the starting eleven that) we
prepared, so we had to make a late adjustment.
"We didn't have any more centre midfielders, so we were forced in
that way, but I don't think it harmed us. Thursday (at Everton)
is a huge game."
Asked about the current situation in Saudi Arabia - where 81
convicted criminals were executed on Saturday:
"I'm just going to answer questions on the game and football. I'm
still bitterly disappointed by the defeat, so it's only right that I
stick to football.
"I'm here to manage the football team and coach the football team,
so I'm well aware of
what is going on around the world
but my focus is on trying to produce a team to win football matches
and get enough points to stay in the league. That's all I'll talk
about....I think I've made my position clear."
Dan Burn:
"I thought it was a sending off. I can guarantee if it was the other
way around, I wouldn't have been on the pitch.
"The ref said because he was looking at the ball the
whole time, that's why he hadn't been (sent off). As I say, I thought it was
bit naughty, but he's not given it and he's ended up scoring at the end.
"It's cost us a little bit, but you can't complain
about it too much. These top quality players can punish if you switch off
for a second, and that's what happens."
Isaac Hayden tweeted post-match:
"Some performance from the boys against 12 men today. Proud
to be associated with the club is an understatement."
Thomas Tuchel said:
"The (Kai) Havertz goal was
exceptional. Of course, we were a bit lucky today and we had a hard time
on the pitch because Newcastle were physical.
"It was difficult to create chances and accelerate the game in the last
30 metres but it was important not to concede and to have the chance
with maybe one quality run, pass and finish to win it and full credit
because we did.
"We defended very well. The distraction level was not the biggest part
today."
On his future amid uncertainty over the future of Chelsea:
"For sure, there's no doubt I stay until the end of the season.
We have to wait day by day because everything can change. The situation
is clear: the club is for sale and hopefully it will go through to sort
things out and give us some perspective. I have no further information
than you already have.
"Day by day is a good way to live your life and now
we're forced to do it because there are circumstances we can't influence. In
some ways that's not so nice but it gives you the freedom to focus on the
things you can influence, which is our performances and show the spirit.
"The focus is on the first team - but Chelsea is much
more than the first team in the Premier League. It's a massive club with
huge tradition and hundreds and hundreds of people and for them it's
important we show the spirit, give them a distraction and show them what
we're about.
"What makes Chelsea special is the quality and commitment of the support
from everybody in our building.
"My last information is we have a plane (for the
Champions League away game in Lille). We can go by plane and go back by
plane. If not we go by train. And if not we go by bus. And if not I'll drive
a seven-seater!
"If you asked me 20 years, 30 years ago if I'd join a
Champions League match at the sideline and what I'm willing to do, I'd say
'where do I have to be when?' We will be there.
"Of course organisation-wise there are some
negotiations but we have brilliant guys who organise the travels and in
every department there are such committed people so things in the moment
feel quite normal."
"We cannot influence the situation and we are also not
responsible for the situation, but at some point it's our responsibility -
because we are in the spotlight and we have these games - every employee of
Chelsea.
"There are a lot of people which I see on a daily basis
who work for decades and are not so famous and are worried for the pretty
close future if things will be alright for them.
"It's important to have the attitude right and to focus
and see the responsibility, what it means to these people. And if it's just
for 90 minutes…
"When we played football during Corona we could not
cure the virus but we were there to give some hope, that they feel joy,
excitement and this is also entertainment. This is what we do now. The
matter is very serious of course."
Asked about attention focused on Chelsea's ownership compared to that of
Newcastle:
"That’s a big question. Unfortunately, the
situation is like this for the owners of Newcastle. What can I say? I don’t
want to point the finger because comparing yourself or blaming others does
not make the situation for us a different situation.
"The statement, that we condemn war and the actions from Russia towards
Ukraine, there is no doubt. But we're facing the consequences actually at
the moment and this is where the focus is. I hope you can understand.
"At some point we have to
trust the process, the process of the league to control who owns a club. We
are only employees and need to trust the process. Like you need to trust the
process when you work for a company doing ethically and morally wrong
things.
"Sometimes we need to ask questions of the process, how this goes; it’s
maybe an ongoing process and it will never end and just reminds us to be
aware and conscious about it and not look away.”
Kai Havertz said:
"Sometimes it looks like this. On the pitch, it's different. People know I'm
not a player who does things like this. This guy is seven, eight foot tall
and I have to jump. As anyone would know, you have to use your arms to jump.
"When I jump and he is two heads higher than me, sometimes there's stuff. I
can say sorry to him because he has an injury on the head and I feel bad.
But you can't tell me I did this on purpose."
Since Newcastle's 2-0 win here in May 2012,
they have lost all nine PL visits to Chelsea. That is one less
than our 11 straight PL defeats at Arsenal, while we've lost
12 on the bounce at Manchester City in the PL.
Toon @ Stamford Bridge: PL era:
2021/22: Lost 0-1
2020/21: Lost 0-2
2019/20: Lost 0-1
2018/19: Lost 1-2 Clark
2017/18: Lost 0-3 (FAC)
2017/18: Lost 1-3 Gayle
2015/16: Lost 1-5 Townsend
2014/15: Lost 0-2
2013/14: Lost 0-3
2012/13: Lost 0-2
2011/12: Won 2-0 Cisse 2
2010/11: Drew 2-2 Gutierrez, S.Taylor
2010/11: Won 4-3 Ranger, R.Taylor, Sh.Ameobi 2 (LC)
2008/09: Drew 0-0
2007/08: Lost 1-2 Butt
2006/07: Lost 0-1
2005/06: Lost 0-1 (FAC)
2005/06: Lost 0-3
2004/05: Lost 0-4
2003/04: Lost 0-5
2002/03: Lost 0-3
2001/02: Lost 0-1 (LC)
2001/02: Drew 1-1 Acuna
2000/01: Lost 1-3 Bassedas
1999/00: Lost 0-1
1998/99: Drew 1-1 Andersson
1997/98: Lost 0-1
1996/97: Drew 1-1 Shearer
1995/96: Drew 1-1 Ferdinand (FAC)
1995/96: Lost 0-1
1994/95: Drew 1-1 Hottiger
1993/94: Lost 0-1
It's three games since Newcastle last netted here; a barren streak
now extending to 320 minutes, but still some way off the
699 minutes endured from August 2001 (Clarence Acuna) until
December 2007 (Nicky Butt).
Before today
Eddie Howe had a rather better recent personal record in SW6 than his
current, guiding
Bournemouth to three PL victories in five visits.
Chelsea became the first side to complete a PL double over Newcastle
this season, following their 3-0 victory at SJP in October.
Chris Wood (eight unbeaten), Bruno Guimaraes (six unbeaten), Dan
Burn (five unbeaten) and Matt Targett (five unbeaten)
all finished on the losing side for the first time as Newcastle
players.
Had the game finished 0-0, Newcastle would have gone five PL away
games without defeat for the first time since the 2011/12 season. An
equal measure of cold comfort can be taken by the fact that this was
the longest time that we've held out here without conceding a goal
since the 2012 away win.
|
Waffle |
There was to be no celebratory post-match photo from the away dressing room at
Stamford Bridge on Sunday, as Newcastle suffered their first Premier League
defeat of 2022.
United's nine match unbeaten run ultimately came to an end at the hands
of a side in turmoil off the pitch, but unbeaten in 13 matches on it and
looking to make it ten home wins in a row against the black and whites.
If the surroundings of their first defeat in 84 days are almost
perpetually associated with failure, at least United found a new of
losing here though, rather than the usual abject surrender.
Concerns were raised with news that Eddie Howe had reverted to a back
five formation. However it then became clear he was doing so with
midfield trio Joelinton, Joe Willock and Jonjo Shelvey all unavailable.
The sight of two goalkeepers on the bench indicated an ever-decreasing
player pool.
As we first noted at West Ham, our organisation levels now mean that any
enforced personnel changes aren't catastrophic, and despite four changes
from the Southampton game, our policy of positive containment meant that
the hosts took 77 minutes to manage a shot on target.
The suspicion may have been that Chelsea lacked focus on the field given
the extraordinary situation of it, but they had gone to Norwich on
Thursday just hours after the news broke and made light of it.
It's also worth noting that a subdued atmosphere here has been a
hallmark of the Abramovich era, not the product of any sanctions imposed
on it.
In a first half of little goal incident, most attention fell on the
centre of the field six minutes before the break when Kai Havertz leapt,
leading with the point of his elbow and smashed Dan Burn in the temple.
Despite looking to "endanger the safety of an opponent" and meeting the
criteria for "serious foul play; the offender was only booked. It was
the injured party who momentarily looking favourite for a red card; Burn
belatedly getting his feet and seemingly set to dispense his own form of
justice until team mates stepped in.
What proved to be United's best chance of a goal from open play came not
long before the break; a free kick from the right cleared to Miguel
Almiron, whose first effort from distance was fisted away by Edouard
Mendy - Fabian Schar sadly hoofing the rebound into the street.
The next controversial episode took place in the home box, when Jacob
Murphy was plainly impeded by Trevoh Chalobah, but again the officials
combined to give no decision despite solid evidence to the contrary -
and equally clear confirmation that the referee was unsighted. Remind me
what the point of VAR is exactly?
Hints that the visitors were starting to run out of steam came when a
couple of counter-attacks saw Chelsea steamroller through central
midfield; their best opportunity other than a clear penalty curtailed
for offside coming when Havertz nodded a great chance straight into the
gloves of Dubravka.
By then Allan Saint-Maximin had arrived for the tiring Almiron, and it's
fair to say that the Frenchman's arrival divided opinion as to whether
it prompted our ultimate defeat - this being one of those days when the
ball bounced off him and benefited the opposition.
Undoubtedly a gamble given the consistent level of performance the
starting eleven had given, partial justification can come from positive
impacts on multiple previous games. A lack of choice on the bench
meanwhile saw the totally
unproven Lucas De Bolle warm up for much of the second half.
Having fashioned virtually nothing at the far end but largely contained
the home side in front of the away section, Schar found himself with a
free header late on but
Mendy saved.
Just when a fighting performance looked like being rewarded with a rare
point and clean sheet here though, the final twist was an untimely
reminder that cheats do prosper. Jorginho's precise pass into the box
saw Havertz eluded Burn before controlling and
flicking the ball past Dubravka to win it.
That saw Ryan Fraser and Dwight Gayle appear, but the
only tangible reward of that "sh*t or bust" double substitute was an instant
booking for Gayle.
Havertz came close to a second in added time when ASM lost the ball, but Dubravka pushed
his shot up and
on to the bar before Lascelles clearing.
Staying fourteenth with a nine point lead over third-bottom Watford and
our next opponents Everton, it's justifiable to label this as a free hit -
concluding two tricky away games three points up and the goal difference
unchanged.
We'll now head for Goodison on Thursday for a game of massive importance to
a Toffees side not only facing financial problems related to Russian
backing, but also the genuine prospect of relegation if their slump
continues. Our resurgence has quelled those fears, but we're still some way
from safety.
Back to today though and the wider implications of
what was jokingly sung about; namely a sea change in the fortunes of the
respective clubs, whose future destiny is fundamentally shaped by government
policy. One was facilitated to gain new owners, the other is now being
forced into it.
Given that just a few weeks ago our primary concern was whether we would
remain in it, to be considering what the Premier League will look like may
seem premature. The evolving Chelsea situation underlines to us though that
scrutiny will remain and attitudes, not just legislation, can change.
Advertising boards with hashtags in support of Ukraine scrolling round this
ground is an odd look, but in some way mirrors the pace of change and
consequent uncertainty it creates in all aspects of daily life. Chelsea's
shirt today was emblazoned with a sponsor who has now severed all ties.
And while Howe may obey orders in saying nothing controversial in public -
and would doubtless be vilified by the media for any "non-football" comments he did pass,
it's rather different for the rank and file cheering his team on.
Our "loadsamoney" chants today may have been prompted by the venue
and the timing of the game, but if we're going to wave flags then let them
be black and white - or Brazilian. It's sad to say that certain elements of
our support would be offended more by rainbow flags than Saudi ones.
Similarly, to those attempting to justify Saudi criminal law on social media
rather than flog spare tickets or rip the proverbial out of Pickford, think
again. Some may like the idea of us becoming the new Millwall complete
"with a no-one likes us" siege mentality, but excuse us if we don't join
in.
"Support the team not the regime" was a divisive
slogan from
the Ashley era, but if anything it's even more relevant in
2022, now that a genuine regime is at the helm rather than a pantomime
villain.
Biffa
|